Jump to content

Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Meetups
   November 2024 +/-
Perth 84 November 2, 2024 (2024-11-02)
London 210 November 10, 2024 (2024-11-10)
US Mountain West online November 12, 2024 (2024-11-12)
Wiki Uff da! - Event 2 November 14, 2024 (2024-11-14)
Oxford 106 November 17, 2024 (2024-11-17)
San Diego 116 November 18, 2024 (2024-11-18)
Seattle meetup November 19, 2024 (2024-11-19)
Wiki Uff da! - Event 3 November 20, 2024 (2024-11-20)
CCA Montreal Editathon November 20, 2024 (2024-11-20)
WikiCon Australia 2024 November 23, 2024 (2024-11-23)
Brighton 3 November 23, 2024 (2024-11-23)
BLT Office Hours November 24, 2024 (2024-11-24)
Brixton 5 November 26, 2024 (2024-11-26)
   December 2024 +/-
Christchurch 34 December 1, 2024 (2024-12-01)
BLT Antenna New Orleans December 7, 2024 (2024-12-07)
London 211 December 8, 2024 (2024-12-08)
Perth 85 December 15, 2024 (2024-12-15)
San Diego 117 December 16, 2024 (2024-12-16)
Seattle meetup December 17, 2024 (2024-12-17)
Full Meetup Calendar • Events calendar on Meta
For meetups in other languages, see the list on Meta

The 2nd Seattle meetup occurred Saturday, January 15, 2005 Seattle Central Library. It was not as large as the November meetup, but that was anticipated: we had trouble finding a day this month that was open for even this many, and we didn't really have an out-of-town contingent this time.

In attendance were:

< I suspect that list isn't complete, please feel free to add yourself as appropriate; there were some comings & goings -- Jmabel | Talk 22:08, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC) >

Topics of conversation included:

  • Wikipedia Signpost, Wikipedia's new internal newspaper, started by Michael Snow.
  • SeattleWiki, started by Matiasp; check out http://www.seattlewiki.org.
  • Possible contact with small, local history museums; Dan Keshet and Jmabel have followed up to the point of drafting Wikipedia:Museum projects, but as of mid-February 2005 there has been no active outreach.
  • Whether some (maybe 1%?) of articles are either sufficiently controversial or sufficient "vandal magnets" that our normal, open way of free-for-all editing may just not work for these; suggestion of starting dialogue on alternatives. Jmabel will probably try to start discussion on this.
  • Larry Sanger's recent criticisms of Wikipedia, and the issues of elitism/anti-elitism
  • Michael Snow pointed out that there is very little in Wikipedia on performers of previous generations, unless their work was in a medium where it would be preserved. For example, our coverage of classical composers is at least semi-decent, but performers of classical music from before the present generation, and especially from before recording, are very under-covered. Even more so for dancers, stage actors, etc.
  • ... and we pretty much all seemed to think Seattle, Washington is ready to be a featured article (which it soon was).