Talk:Bronze Age

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bronze Age article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2

Archaeology Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Top‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assyria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Metalworking Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Huh?

How can the Copper Age replace the Stone Age? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.0.233.134 (talk) 21:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That’s weird. I have never heard of the “Copper Age”. Should this be replaced? 2001:569:5657:1000:EC90:F2E8:7CC2:86DE (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a term used in some periodizations of some regions. Remsense诉 02:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BRUH 2A02:C7C:E855:AE00:948:12AB:9CDB:349D (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can the copper age replacing the stone age 2A02:C7C:E855:AE00:948:12AB:9CDB:349D (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is forged.

This article has been copied and pasted from an unknown source. This needs fixed. 38.43.22.44 (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems not to be the case:

The only page as far as I can tell that mirrors much of the page's prose verbatim is this slide deck, which was clearly copying from Wikipedia, and was published after all the edits originally adding to the article.
The page's edit history does not seem nefarious, I don't see any copyvio editing patterns looking through it.

But, that's what I've ascertained from checking known sources. I couldn't say anything about whether it's been copied from an unknown source—no one could say that, oh no! Remsense诉 19:56, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So this forge was forged from a website that forged wikipedia? 38.43.22.44 (talk) 22:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, nothing in this Wikipedia article has been plagiarised from another source. Remsense诉 22:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I.e., there's no evidence found to indicate that this article was copied from some other source.

Instead, at least one other article was found that copied from this article. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations#Other websites copying Wikipedia (and see citogenesis, too).

(And what you're describing isn't forgery, it's copyright infringement.) Guy Harris (talk) 07:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgery is a white-collar crime, plagiarism is for the hoi polloi. Remsense诉 10:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I think I know why now. Thanks. 38.43.22.44 (talk) 18:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok 38.43.22.44 (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poop

poop is nasty 2A02:C7C:E855:AE00:948:12AB:9CDB:349D (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]